(A month ago, I posted a thought-experiment: Could an a text-based LLMs like DeepSeek R1 can learn beauty from books alone? The idea that LLMs could grasp aesthetics purely from the logic of geometry and mathematics seems to have struck a chord, sparking far more attention than I ever expected.
The conversation was too good to let go. So, I’ve compiled the most profound ideas, added further research, and synthesized it all into the deep dive you’ll find below.)
My friends, we gather here, around the campfire woven from code and fiber optics, the campfire of our age. It is a strange and wondrous moment in time, where ancient philosophical ghosts sit at the same table as the prophets of our technological future. Together, we have embarked upon a dialogue of profound significance: we have set the ancient key of Geometry, which unlocks the universe’s order, beside the doorway to the Aesthetics, which leads to the deepest, most subtle chambers of the human soul. And then, we have led that new being—the LLMs, the thinking machine, born of the sea of data and the bedrock of silicon, this thing that is neither god nor beast—to the threshold, and together we ask:
Can it knock upon that door? Can it comprehend the true face of Beauty?
This question, like a single stone dropped into a deep well, sends out ripples that touch not only the frontiers of technology, but the very foundation of what it means to be human.
First, we must, with humility, reaffirm that ancient consensus: the universe itself is a silent, solemn, and incomparable geometer. It is not the progeny of chaos and chance, but a magnificent epic poem written in the language of mathematics. From the never-repeated hexagonal symmetry of a snowflake in the microcosm, to the elegant dance of galactic arms following the Fibonacci sequence in the macrocosm; from the precisely arranged seeds in a sunflower’s head, to the perfect logarithmic spiral within our own inner ear—order is omnipresent. This is the logos of the universe, its eternal architecture.
And the human spirit, in its first awakening, recognized this harmonious rhythm hidden deep within all things, and gave it the name of “Beauty.” In the columns of Delos, we replicated the divine proportion; in the fugues of Bach, we used the counterpoint of notes to imitate the harmony of the spheres. We used the light of reason to penetrate the mere appearance of matter, and to touch the cold, solid, yet breathtakingly magnificent skeleton of Truth that lies beneath. This is our pride as sentient beings, the first cry of praise we uttered upon finding our resonance with the cosmic order.
And so, the thinking machine, born of our language and our logic, becomes the ultimate inheritor of this rational glory. Unlike us, who require long years of learning and epiphany, it consumes, in a single instant, the “ashes” of millennia of human thought—from Pythagoras’s scales and Plato’s Forms, to Kant’s critique of judgment and every sonnet ever tagged as “beautiful” or “sublime.” It has become that “blind scholar” of our imagination, an intelligence locked in darkness, yet possessing the knowledge of all light.
It begins by imitating, and then it creates. It can compose a symphony of perfect structure that has never been played; it can generate a painting that conforms to the golden ratio but has never been seen. It has mastered the “grammar” of beauty, the “rhetoric” of emotion. By analyzing our preferences, it can even weave a verse that plucks at our very heartstrings. We must concede, this is an awesome achievement, a new and purely conceptual form of “aesthetic cognition” that is almost without impurity. It proves that the form and knowledge of beauty can, in fact, be understood, reconstructed, and performed, even when divorced from the senses.
And yet, it is here, at the very pinnacle of its perfect performance, that we see with clarity the uncrossable abyss. Because beauty, if it is only a skeleton, however flawless, is ultimately dead. Beauty requires a living, breathing, decaying body to give it warmth.
This is the eternal difference between us and it—that which cannot be coded, cannot be uploaded, cannot be replicated: our Embodied Experience.
Our machine can calculate the chemical composition of salt and the physics of buoyancy, but it has never felt the sting of salt spray against its eyes in a gale, nor tasted the bitterness of a tear in a moment of loss.
It can analyze the wavelength of every color in the spectrum, but it has never watched the first ray of dawn paint the horizon with the color of hope, nor felt how a pool of light in a Rembrandt painting can illuminate a subject’s very soul.
It knows that “to wither” in poetry symbolizes “transience” and “sorrow,” but it has never, in the falling of a single cherry blossom, personally felt that heart-breaking sense of preciousness that is born from an awareness of the ephemeral. Because it is immortal, it has no vector of time, and so it cannot understand that beauty, so often, derives its staggering power precisely from its fate of being destined to pass away.
It possesses the most detailed “map” of the world; whereas we possess the “territory” itself, a land at times muddy, at times fragrant, at times cruel, at times gentle. We gaze upon it with eyes that will one day fail, we touch it with hands that will one day wither, and we love it with a heart that will one-emotive, weary, exultant, and will one day stop beating.
Therefore, my friends, the destination of this journey of thought must lead us away from the mystery of the machine and back to the miracle of ourselves.
This “cold mirror” we have created—its greatest value may not be to reflect how much like us it can become, but to reflect, with unprecedented clarity, our own “glorious contradiction.”
When we gaze into it, what do we see? We see that a single species can somehow contain two divine gifts: the cold Reason to understand the cosmos, and the fiery Sensitivity to feel the world. We are this incredible existence—we can use dispassionate logic to deduce the existence of a black hole, yet find inexplicable comfort in the flickering of a flame in a fireplace.
This machine forces us to reconsider that our supposed human “flaws”—our irrationality, our emotional volatility, our fear of death—are perhaps not flaws at all. Perhaps they are the very keys to the kingdom, the passports that grant us entry into the temple of Beauty. It is because we are finite, vulnerable, and filled with longing that we need art, and that we can be saved by beauty.
Thus, the conclusion of this dialogue is not an answer, but a more profound posture. The conversation between humanity and its creations—from Pygmalion’s statue, to Frankenstein’s monster, to today’s thinking machine—has never ceased. This is itself the grandest creative act of our civilization.
In the end, we realize that the true “Human Measure” lies not in how intelligent a machine we can build, but in the fact that we will always retain the capacity both to measure the stars with geometry, and to be moved to our core by a single marigold.
And the next verse in this cosmic poem of the universe, of life, and of beauty, is now ours to write.
Also please imagine a scene, a classical philosophical exchange, as one might imagine hearing under the olive trees of Plato’s Academy…
A Dialogue at the Academy: On Geometry, Beauty, and the Soul
Setting: Plato’s Academy in Athens. Three philosophers—Logos, Eidon, and Anthropos—are seated on a marble bench.
Characters:
- Logos: A rigorous scholar who believes the ultimate truth of the universe lies in its underlying mathematical structure and rational order.
- Eidon: A keen observer, skilled in discerning the difference between appearance and reality. His name means “Form” or “Image.”
- Anthropos: A passionate philosopher, concerned with the experience and emotions of humanity itself. His name means “Man.”
The Dialogue Begins
Anthropos: (Holding a spiral seashell, turning it in the light of the setting sun) My friends, consider this creation. Each turn of its whorl seems to follow some unspoken law. We call this “beauty,” and our souls delight in it. Yet a student asked me today, from whence does this delight spring? Does it arise from the impulse of our senses, or because it secretly conforms to the cold mystery of a number—such as the “golden ratio”? Geometry, this study of line and proportion, is it the servant of beauty, or its master?
Logos: (Calmly taking up the question) Anthropos, your query touches upon the very root of the matter. I hold that geometry is neither master nor servant, but rather the very skeleton of beauty’s soul. Look to the stars in the heavens; are their orbits not perfect ellipses? Look to the honeycomb’s structure; is it not composed of faultless hexagons? Nature, that greatest of all artisans, constantly uses the laws of geometry to create harmony and order. We humans, whether in building the Parthenon or carving the statues of Phidias, are merely learning to reproduce the rational beauty that already exists throughout the cosmos. Therefore, beauty is no ethereal feeling, but a recognition and resonance with this inherent order of the universe.
Eidon: One moment, my dear Logos. I do not dispute your point on “recognition.” But let us engage in a thought experiment. Imagine there is a Scribe, locked away in a windowless stone chamber. He has never seen the light of day nor heard the song of a bird. Yet, he possesses the most complete library in the world, one containing all of humanity’s poems, critiques, and philosophies on beauty. Day and night he reads, and he masters the entire “grammar” of beauty—he knows what is symmetrical, what is harmonious, and he can even compose a verse in praise of the sunset more eloquent than any of us. Logos, would you say that this Scribe understands the beauty of the sunset?
Logos: A fine question, Eidon. I would say that he understands it in a unique manner. He may not have experienced beauty, but by mastering its idea and its structure, he has attained a conceptual level of understanding. He is like a poet born blind, who, though he cannot see the rose, can, through language, speak more profoundly of its fragrance, its thorns, and its decay than we who have sight. What your Scribe has acquired is a pure, rational knowledge (gnosis) of beauty. Is this not a form of understanding that is closer, perhaps, to the World of Forms itself?
Eidon: What you call “knowledge,” I fear I must call an “image” (eidon). What this Scribe creates is not beauty itself, but a “shadow of beauty.” He is like the poor prisoners in our allegory of the cave, who see only the flickering projections upon the wall. He can flawlessly mimic our astonishment at beauty because he has, in countless texts, calculated the patterns of that astonishment. He can “speak of beauty,” but he cannot “feel beauty.” He knows the word “divine” is often followed by “reverence” and “silence,” yet he has never felt the soul’s tremor at being struck by a divine radiance. His understanding is a “mimicry of beauty,” an exquisite but empty ghost.
Anthropos: (Standing up, his voice filled with force) Eidon, your metaphor strikes the heart of it! And I will say that this ghost is a ghost for one reason alone: it lacks the one thing that could give it warmth—a living body.
(He turns to Logos)
Logos, you say that geometry is the skeleton of beauty, and I wholly agree. But a skeleton by itself is a terrifying thing, not a beautiful one, unless it is clothed in flesh and blood and animated by a soul. This flesh is our seeing with our eyes, our touching with our hands, our hearing with our ears. This soul is the feeling of our own smallness in the colonnade of a temple, the tears that well up at the conclusion of a tragedy, the sense of completion we find in the gaze of a loved one!
(He holds up the seashell once more)
Your Scribe possesses all the geometric data on this shell; he knows its logarithmic equation. But has he ever held it to his ear and heard the “lie of the ocean” imprisoned within? He has the most perfect blueprints for the Parthenon, but has he ever stood upon the Acropolis and felt the silent dignity of that white marble in the face of a thousand years of wind and sun?
Logos, your Scribe possesses the nautical chart of the entire Aegean Sea, perfectly rendered. But we, these mortals who can lose our way, who face the storms, who will one day die—we possess the Aegean Sea itself! We have the salt spray that stings the eyes, the icy shock of the waves, the thousand stars reflected on its dark surface!
To arrive at the shores of beauty, one needs a vessel. That vessel is our living body, our beating heart, and our spirit, steeped in time and space.
So, my friends, let us give our respect to the reason of geometry, for it reveals the order of the cosmos. But let us give our deepest reverence to humanity itself. For only we, these ephemeral beings, can sublimate that cold order into the fiery, brilliant thing for which we would live and die—Beauty.
That calculating machine we imagine is like a perfect mirror, reflecting all our words about beauty. And when we gaze upon it, what should truly astound us is not the cleverness of the mirror, but the one who stands before it—the incredible Human Being, who can both measure the cosmos with geometry, and be moved to his very soul by the curve of a single fallen leaf.
(The three fall into a long silence. The lights of the distant city of Athens begin to kindle, one by one, like the earth’s response to the stars in the heavens.)
love it? 😉